How To Beat Diebold Machine Election Fraud-Voters Hand Write In All Candidate Names In Ink

Are you sick and tired of Election Fraud caused by For Profit Voting Machines that have been known to be rigged for fraud ?  

       For the past year or so, we've been researching the prospects of having all Voters Hand Write In All Candidate Names (whether its printed on the ballot -- indicating fees paid to Elections Board to Have Name Printed) including those who are STILL ELIGIBLE TO RUN & WIN.

    Even if their names are not on 'officially registered' on 'published' candidate Indexes at your lcoal Elections Office; they are in the running.  

The Atlantic - Running As A Write-In: As Hard As It Seems ?

    Yet, the mass media act like only those 'officially registered' exist (like in San Francisco's Case only about 5 are 'marked' and printed on official Election Records- yet,, there's another 10 or 15 Candidates for Mayor, still on file as registered but not on 'published list') but in reality, they are still in the race. 

  The sad fact is, more folks are still running whom the media and elite want you to ignore.  It's cheaper for them if you ignore them than it is to demonize them, but they'll do that if they have to, to put opinions in your head you aren't making based on meeting the folks in question.  Listen to yourself, not mass media.

   The Good Fact is that any one of the Five or so names 'published' OR any of the other 10 or 15 'registered but not published' Candidates are ALL in the running.

  And they ALL have lots of issues to bring out and plans to share and they have lots of supporters. 

    Facts you won't find in The Chronicle, Examiner or get from the Elections office site or staff.  

Has A Write In Candidate Ever Won An Election ?

     You have to be around, look around and get to know all the people in your town running for office. 

   Seek them out because the folks with megabucks and those who control your local media do not want you to know that viable candidates that are honest and trustworthy DO EXIST and are running for office in your town and here in San Francisco.

     Don't be fooled or told 'how the election's going to be' by talking heads and pawns of the elite.  MAKE YOUR ELECTION HAPPEN FOR YOUR SELF AND YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY'S BEST INTERESTS.

    As you learn history of 'Write-In's" and their importance in elections you will realize that as you get to now the locals in San Francisco and your town, running for Mayor or local councils or state and federal seats;   that all voices must be heard and all candidates made available for public dialogue.  

The Straight Dope Since 1973 - Elections Forum

     We must do this in order for us to choose a new path away from the usual old greedy elite and out of town pawns sent into our communities to distort election choices, hide all viable candidates who don't have megabucks. 

   Their goals are to take control over your elections by all manner of deception and fraud.  Including the use of Electronic Voting Machines (aka Diebold Machines).

    We advocate every voter taking it upon themselves to stop the expensive and corrupted use of machines like Diebolds' famous for being rigged in the 2000 and 2004 elections and many others.  

The Fix - Tortured History of Write In Candidates

   All you have to do is HAND WRITE IN ALL CANDIDATE NAMES on your ballots, no matter if their names are pre-printed on them with a check box or not. 

   If Many Voters HAND WRITE and more and more hand write each election, then real humans will be paid in your local community to hand count the ballots. 

    This keeps cash in your community, as the election machines will no longer being needed or wanted which give your lcoal community more cash flow that's not going to a major election machine corporation that can't be trusted, ever again.

 Here's some links to the HIstory of Write In Elections, so you can see how real people get elected - that don't have power over the media or megabucks to spend:

   1.  Bing Search - Results for:  "history of write in" california - http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22history+of+write+in%22+california


   2.  The Atlantic -  Running as a Write-In: As Hard as It Sounds? -  http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/09/running-as-a-write-in-as-hard-as-it-sounds/62710/


   3.  The Straight Dope - 'FIghting Ignorance Since 1973' - Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Elections Has a write in Candidate Ever Won a Major Election?  -   http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=585369


  4.  The Washington Post - The tortured history of write-in candidates
By Aaron Blake - http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/the-tortured-history-of-write-.html 
 

 
  5.  Wikipedia Excerpt:  

       From:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write-in_candidate

Write-in candidate  From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of the Politics series
Elections
Basic types
By-election (special election) Direct / Indirect Fixed-term General Mid-term Primary Recall Show Sortition (allotment)
Terminology
Anonymous elector Apportionment Boundary delimitation (redistricting) Crossover voting Election silence Gerrymandering Initiative Psephology (electoral study and analysis) Secret ballot Suffrage Two-round ("runoff")
Subseries
Political party Voting Voting systems
Lists
Elections by country Most recent Next general elections Electoral calendars for 2015 Supranational National Local
Related
Criticisms of electoral politics Electoral fraud Referendum (by country)

A write-in candidate is a candidate in an election whose name does not appear on the ballot, but for whom voters may vote nonetheless by writing in the person's name.

   The system is almost totally confined to elections in the United States. Some U.S. states and local jurisdictions allow a voter to affix a sticker with a write-in candidate's name on it to the ballot in lieu of actually writing in the candidate's name.

  Write-in candidacies are sometimes a result of a candidate being legally or procedurally ineligible to run under his or her own name or party; ..... SEE MORE ON WIKIPEDIA

 VOTING TIPS FOR WRITE IN SUPPORT:

    Remember that if you like other candidates and form voting blocks to support the best 3 Write In Candidates or Others you trust, then Write Their Names onto your Voting Ballots, On Election Day (don't vote early -- some candidate finance info doesn't come out until 3 days before election day. Vote early means uninformed vote) and they may win.

  But, all locals working for human rights and justice for all MUST WORK TOGETHER to FORM ALLIANCE TO PUSH WRITE IN CANDIDATES INTO OFFICE.

    We have Rank Choice Voting, so, we must be organized and debate and study ALL CANDIDATES and then we must all pick the best 3 Candidates we trust and VOTE TOGETHER.

  More on this topic another day !   Cheers!

Moderators-1% Change Makers in San Francisco
Doing Something to Reduce Harm, Save Lives or Improve Our Community Every Day

 P.S. When you decide personally or as a group to support any candidate you choose, then the fact can be what you make it to be.

   That any one of them and could win if The People wake up and understand facts as they are, not as government agencies or the media presents them.   Don't let media or elite tell you how it's gonna be. BASTA THAT!

RELATED SFAWARENESS GROUP BLOG ARTICLE ON 24 CANDIDATES FOR MAYOR OF SAN FRANCISCO IS HERE: 

https://sfawareness.blogspot.com/2015/05/sf-election-2015-candidates-for-mayor.html

Never Forget SF BOS Members Wiener, Farrell, Tang, Christensen-Are Against Mission Moratorium

Supervisors Scott Wiener, Mark Farrell, Katy Tang and Julie Christensen voted against it, providing enough votes to block the moratorium’s passage.  

    So, perhaps we must explore Recall Elections because if OUR PEOPLE in great numbers are in Crisis and a State of Emergency and we have Seven SF BOS Members 'doing something' to Honor The Will and The Dire Needs of Residents in Harm's Way Today, then we only need to REPLACE TWO SF BOS MEMBERS with honorable BOS Members we can trust to NOT THINK TOO MUCH (Justice, Protection Delayed is Justice, Protection Denied) or keep DOING things against the urgent needs and will of The People.

  Link to PDF File:  San Francisco Guide:  How To Recall SF Officials 

   Obviously, Wiener, Farrell (paid off by Millionaire Real Estate Mogul/Mongrol Coates in the last BOS Election Cycle -- Early Voters Never Knew That Because Facts Came Out Just A Few Days Before Election Day - Early Voting is a Fraud that denies Voters Campaign Information that only comes out 3 days prior to Election Day) and now naive Christensen and should-have-known-better Ms. Tang ARE ALL PART OF THE PROBLEM.

  Their lack of immediate action to SUPPORT THE PEOPLE means they are going to do what they want and what The Elite banksters want, even if it harms tens of thousands of us, who are in A State of Emergency & Crisis.

     SCREW THE INCAPABLE TRAITORS WHO ACT AGAINST THE PEOPLE AND CAUSE HARM BY THEIR OWN LACK OF JUST AND TIMELY ACTION OR INABILITY TO GRASP THE SEVERITY & IRREPARABLE DAMAGE OF WHAT'S HAPPENING, RIGHT NOW !

  So, we're sharing the Official San Francisco Guide to Recall Elections.  Check out the new 'DOCUMENT' links to the right of this page.    Use the BACK button in your browser to come back to this blog after you click on those links and download the PDF Files there.

       We are out of time people.  I do not wish to see another 10,000 Local Residents become impoverished because of the lack of Experience, Wisdom and Positive Action and Integrity to the People of these Four Bad Acting Members of Our SF Board of Supervisors who must be recalled and replaced with folks we can count on, before we lose any more of our friends, relatives, neighbors or friends who are in harm's way, today. 

     We are out of time.

The Time to Act As We've Never Done Before Is At Hand.  Step up and take drastic action to protect yourselves in these perilous times. 

    The arguments of the four Board of Supervisor Members (Wiener, Farrell, Tang, Christensen) against the Moratorium are naive or lying when they act like 'can't do Moratorium cause we don't know how we can fund 'affordable housing' without the developers.... ;  (think, think, think.   Do The Moratorium, Then FIND THE MONEY, Solve the People's Immediate Crisis, Then Solve for profit needs LATER). 

    Seattle has been using tons of money from McKinney-Vento Funds (for decades) to make Mixed Use, Mixed Low to Middle Income Buildings, OWNED BY THE CITY OR NON-PROFITS, built at cost that have 1st Floor retail RENTED OUT to offset building operations and keeps community together by putting variable income folks together in the same building.  

In San Francisco, officials have some kind of huge human trafficking scheme that makes them borrow expensive cash and work with devious and corrupted developers who have a policy to push our homeless folks INTO PERMANENT MENTAL ILLNESS DISABILITY CLAIMS to 'repay' our city for what it spends on our people. 

     And the non-profit programs and shelters have LONG HISTORIES of massive abuse, corruption and embezzlement of money, food and resources (often for catering gigs on the side, paid for by taxpayers).

     The purpose of Declaring an Emergency is to STOP HARM NOW.   All other future considerations and 'predictions' are moot and misplaced.  Once The Emergency is Declared and all is FROZEN, then The City will be FORCED to CHANGE it's ways of funding and start to De-Privatize to take back hundreds of millions in revenue that BELONGS TO US ALL, that is now taken away from our local cash flows and city coffers to the Global Banksters and Corporations (like SFPark-Serco Global) for mega profits.  The ones who cause our harm are the same ones who operate our human and other city services.

  We must LEARN from Seattle who's been doing at cost housing using federal funds in ways that our city's leaders either don't know about or don't want to know because they LIKE the Corporate Mastered Status Quo system we have by which the Elite sell off Visas and import tens of thousands of Foreign Workers who displace our jobs and homes, en mass.    

  To try to be slick and VOTE NO based on what may happen is ridiculous and totally short sighted.  An Emergency is what it is. A Declaration that OUR PEOPLE NEED HELP NOW AND THEIR IMMEDIATE NEEDS AND SURVIVAL ARE PARAMOUNT TO ALL OTHER FOR PROFIT AND OTHER BUSINESS INTERESTS, PERIOD.   THAT IS WHY ITS CALLED AN EMERGENCY.   The Mega Elite aren't going to become sick, homeless or lose their lives if an Emergency Declaration is declared but OUR PEOPLE WILL.

Those in favor put Our People's Needs Now- Above all other concerns.

    Those Against, put their own egos, ideas, dreams, wishes and predictions AHEAD OF THE DIRE CRITICAL CONDITIONS OUR PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING UNDER, TODAY. 

THE'RE CLEARLY OUT OF TOUCH, DELUSIONAL, ON DRUGS, LIQUOR OR PAID OFF BY THE ELITE OR ARE IGNORANT.   THEY CAN'T BE LONG TIME RESIDENTS HERE OR THEY WOULD HAVE STOOD WITH OUR PEOPLE IN NEED -- NOT AGAINST THEM.

Recall All Who Harm The People Now, or The Harm Will Never Stop.

J. Leonard
SF Community Advocate

If Your City or County Leaders Fail Your People-Try Incorporating A Town or Village of Your Own-SF-Mission Village

California City Incorporation Laws - By Andrew Sylvia - eHow Contributor

     The Declaration of Independence noted that sometimes in the course of human events it's necessary for one group of people to politically break away from another, and the Founding Fathers undertook revolution to achieve that goal.

    If residents of a municipality in the State of California wish to do the same thing, all they need to do is file some documents, and have some hearings and elections.


  Excerpted:  http://www.ehow.com/about_5456924_california-city-incorporation-laws.html

  Read More : http://www.ehow.com/about_5456924_california-city-incorporation-laws.html


How Does a City Incorporate?  By Joseph Nicholson  -  eHow Contributor
    
  Read More : http://www.ehow.com/how-does_4913925_a-city-incorporate.html


 The Differences Between Incorporated & Unincorporated Villages - By Barbara Bean-Mellinger - eHow Contributor

    A village is a group of residents living near one another who share some common services. Though there are no specific numbers of population that define a village, it is generally smaller than a town.





   Excerpted:   http://www.ehow.com/list_7656439_differences-between-incorporated-unincorporated-villages.html


Have Fun!